<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 326 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 69C for unexplained expenditure and the estimation of Net Profit rate. The addition under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits was deleted as it pertained to a prior assessment year. The Tribunal remanded the penalty under Section 271AAA back to the Assessing Officer for a detailed reconsideration due to lack of specific findings in the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 326 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 69C for unexplained expenditure and the estimation of Net Profit rate. The addition under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits was deleted as it pertained to a prior assessment year. The Tribunal remanded the penalty under Section 271AAA back to the Assessing Officer for a detailed reconsideration due to lack of specific findings in the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>