<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 325 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Ld. AO for verification of KOPT&#039;s tax liability discharge regarding the royalty amount disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). For the disallowance under Section 14A, the Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s directions to compute disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) only for investments yielding exempt income. All three appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2023 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 325 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Ld. AO for verification of KOPT&#039;s tax liability discharge regarding the royalty amount disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). For the disallowance under Section 14A, the Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s directions to compute disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) only for investments yielding exempt income. All three appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>