https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436297 The appellant was accused of misclassifying their service but was found to have no revenue implications due to available abatements. The charge of not including the value of materials supplied by clients in the gross value of the service was dismissed based on established legal principles. The case was remanded for re-quantification of service tax, if any, after allowing abatements. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436297 The appellant was accused of misclassifying their service but was found to have no revenue implications due to available abatements. The charge of not including the value of materials supplied by clients in the gross value of the service was dismissed based on established legal principles. The case was remanded for re-quantification of service tax, if any, after allowing abatements. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436297