<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1993 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307380</link>
    <description>For cheques drawn on a company&#039;s account, a Section 138 prosecution requires the complaint to identify the company as drawer and to contain the necessary foundational averments against it. Statutory demand notice must be served on the drawer company. Later impleadment of the company under criminal procedure, without curing delay or the original statutory non-compliance, cannot rectify those defects. A managing director&#039;s liability is vicarious and depends on a valid prosecution of the company as principal offender; failure to validly proceed against the company therefore undermines proceedings against the director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 08:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1993 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307380</link>
      <description>For cheques drawn on a company&#039;s account, a Section 138 prosecution requires the complaint to identify the company as drawer and to contain the necessary foundational averments against it. Statutory demand notice must be served on the drawer company. Later impleadment of the company under criminal procedure, without curing delay or the original statutory non-compliance, cannot rectify those defects. A managing director&#039;s liability is vicarious and depends on a valid prosecution of the company as principal offender; failure to validly proceed against the company therefore undermines proceedings against the director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>