https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307377 The High Court could not decide the matter on abandonment of the State's intention to contribute towards compensation because that plea was neither raised in the pleadings nor covered by any framed issue, leaving no scope for evidence on it. The acquisition also did not lose its public purpose merely because the State allegedly withdrew that intention: the notifications identified a public purpose, and the record showed a continuing governmental decision to contribute a fixed amount toward acquisition costs. On that basis, the finding that the acquisition was not for a public purpose was unsustainable, the State's appeal succeeded, and the trial court's decree was restored. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Apr 2023 12:06:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307377 The High Court could not decide the matter on abandonment of the State's intention to contribute towards compensation because that plea was neither raised in the pleadings nor covered by any framed issue, leaving no scope for evidence on it. The acquisition also did not lose its public purpose merely because the State allegedly withdrew that intention: the notifications identified a public purpose, and the record showed a continuing governmental decision to contribute a fixed amount toward acquisition costs. On that basis, the finding that the acquisition was not for a public purpose was unsustainable, the State's appeal succeeded, and the trial court's decree was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307377