<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 169 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32378</link>
    <description>The Court held that the appellant, a scheduled bank, was entitled to a deduction of 4/5th of the dividend income from the Unit Trust of India for the assessment year 1994-95. The interpretation of &#039;such income&#039; in the proviso to Section 80M favored the appellant&#039;s position, allowing them to claim the deduction on the total dividend income rather than a limited portion. The Court reversed the Tribunal&#039;s decision and upheld the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the deduction, in line with the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 169 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32378</link>
      <description>The Court held that the appellant, a scheduled bank, was entitled to a deduction of 4/5th of the dividend income from the Unit Trust of India for the assessment year 1994-95. The interpretation of &#039;such income&#039; in the proviso to Section 80M favored the appellant&#039;s position, allowing them to claim the deduction on the total dividend income rather than a limited portion. The Court reversed the Tribunal&#039;s decision and upheld the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the deduction, in line with the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>