<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the ad-hoc determination of the arm&#039;s length price by the Transfer Pricing Officer without jurisdiction is unsustainable in law. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). As a result, the other grounds raised by the appellant became inconsequential, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the ad-hoc determination of the arm&#039;s length price by the Transfer Pricing Officer without jurisdiction is unsustainable in law. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). As a result, the other grounds raised by the appellant became inconsequential, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>