<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436257</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for a 200% deduction under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act for R&amp;amp;D expenses for the entire financial year 2011-12. However, the late deposit of employees&#039; PF contribution was disallowed, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed, with the first issue decided in favor of the assessee and the second issue in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436257</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for a 200% deduction under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act for R&amp;amp;D expenses for the entire financial year 2011-12. However, the late deposit of employees&#039; PF contribution was disallowed, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed, with the first issue decided in favor of the assessee and the second issue in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>