<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 279 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, as the matter was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and the AO had adequately investigated the purchases. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 279 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, as the matter was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and the AO had adequately investigated the purchases. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>