<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436239</link>
    <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Delhi HC held that money laundering is an independent and continuing offence involving concealment, possession, acquisition, use, or projection of proceeds of crime as untainted property. It found that the wide definition of proceeds of crime, together with surrounding circumstances such as shareholding pattern, conduct, accommodation entries, and statements recorded under Section 50, may establish beneficial ownership and effective control, and that such statements have evidentiary weight at the bail stage. Applying broad probabilities rather than a mini trial, the Court held that the material prima facie showed involvement in handling proceeds of crime and that the petitioners had not satisfied the twin conditions under Section 45. Bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436239</link>
      <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Delhi HC held that money laundering is an independent and continuing offence involving concealment, possession, acquisition, use, or projection of proceeds of crime as untainted property. It found that the wide definition of proceeds of crime, together with surrounding circumstances such as shareholding pattern, conduct, accommodation entries, and statements recorded under Section 50, may establish beneficial ownership and effective control, and that such statements have evidentiary weight at the bail stage. Applying broad probabilities rather than a mini trial, the Court held that the material prima facie showed involvement in handling proceeds of crime and that the petitioners had not satisfied the twin conditions under Section 45. Bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>