<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 259 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436233</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner&#039;s products were not initially included in the negative list, so the benefits of fiscal incentives could not be denied retrospectively. The petitioner was permitted to seek benefits under the relevant notifications, and the respondents were directed to decide claims in accordance with the law. The court disposed of the petition and pending applications accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 259 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436233</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner&#039;s products were not initially included in the negative list, so the benefits of fiscal incentives could not be denied retrospectively. The petitioner was permitted to seek benefits under the relevant notifications, and the respondents were directed to decide claims in accordance with the law. The court disposed of the petition and pending applications accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>