<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 84 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, holding that service tax was not payable on the commission paid to overseas agents without a presence in India before the amendment on 18.4.2006. The decision aligned with the distinction between onshore and offshore services, emphasizing that offshore services were not taxable pre-amendment. The Tribunal set aside the tax demand, interest, and penalties, allowing the assessees&#039; appeals and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 84 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, holding that service tax was not payable on the commission paid to overseas agents without a presence in India before the amendment on 18.4.2006. The decision aligned with the distinction between onshore and offshore services, emphasizing that offshore services were not taxable pre-amendment. The Tribunal set aside the tax demand, interest, and penalties, allowing the assessees&#039; appeals and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>