<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1381 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307360</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi allowed five separate appeals by the assessee against orders of the CIT(A)-27, Delhi for A.Y. 2011-12 to 2015-16. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions of foreign travelling expenses as unexplained expenditure in all assessment years, as the additions lacked incriminating material found during the search, in line with previous judgments and the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 21:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1381 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307360</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi allowed five separate appeals by the assessee against orders of the CIT(A)-27, Delhi for A.Y. 2011-12 to 2015-16. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions of foreign travelling expenses as unexplained expenditure in all assessment years, as the additions lacked incriminating material found during the search, in line with previous judgments and the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>