<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1361 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that no addition on account of deemed rent on unsold flats could be made. The decision was based on the assessee meeting all the conditions for exclusion under section 22 of the Act, as the unsold flats were considered stock-in-trade and used for business purposes. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 21:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1361 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that no addition on account of deemed rent on unsold flats could be made. The decision was based on the assessee meeting all the conditions for exclusion under section 22 of the Act, as the unsold flats were considered stock-in-trade and used for business purposes. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>