https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307368 Bail adjudication must remain confined to a prima facie assessment of the case and the relevant bail factors; it cannot become a mini-trial through meticulous evidence evaluation or intrusive scientific tests such as lie detector, brain mapping, or narcoanalysis. In sexual offence matters, judicial orders must preserve victim anonymity, because disclosure of identifying particulars breaches the confidentiality mandate under Section 228A IPC and the protective provisions applicable to child victims. The SC held that the High Court exceeded the proper scope of bail jurisdiction and violated the statutory bar on identity disclosure, and the impugned bail order was quashed with directions to expedite the trial. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307368 Bail adjudication must remain confined to a prima facie assessment of the case and the relevant bail factors; it cannot become a mini-trial through meticulous evidence evaluation or intrusive scientific tests such as lie detector, brain mapping, or narcoanalysis. In sexual offence matters, judicial orders must preserve victim anonymity, because disclosure of identifying particulars breaches the confidentiality mandate under Section 228A IPC and the protective provisions applicable to child victims. The SC held that the High Court exceeded the proper scope of bail jurisdiction and violated the statutory bar on identity disclosure, and the impugned bail order was quashed with directions to expedite the trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307368