<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1990 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307368</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s bail order for the accused in a case involving serious offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The High Court&#039;s decision was deemed to violate established criminal law principles, particularly in ordering scientific tests resembling a mini-trial. Criticism was also directed at the High Court for repeatedly disclosing the victim&#039;s identity, contrary to legal provisions safeguarding victim anonymity. The State&#039;s lethargic response in not filing an appeal prompted the Supreme Court to intervene, emphasizing the State&#039;s duty to uphold legal standards. The Court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings while highlighting the significance of adhering to legal principles and protecting victims&#039; identities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 21:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1990 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307368</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s bail order for the accused in a case involving serious offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The High Court&#039;s decision was deemed to violate established criminal law principles, particularly in ordering scientific tests resembling a mini-trial. Criticism was also directed at the High Court for repeatedly disclosing the victim&#039;s identity, contrary to legal provisions safeguarding victim anonymity. The State&#039;s lethargic response in not filing an appeal prompted the Supreme Court to intervene, emphasizing the State&#039;s duty to uphold legal standards. The Court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings while highlighting the significance of adhering to legal principles and protecting victims&#039; identities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>