https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307362 The High Court held that the Upa Lok Ayukta lacked jurisdiction to entertain a civil dispute pending before a competent Civil Court. It emphasized that Lok Ayukta bodies do not have appellate authority over designated forums and cannot issue positive directions. The petitioner was granted liberty to withdraw the complaint and pursue remedies in the Civil Court or other competent authorities. The writ petition was disposed of, confirming the recommendatory nature of the Lok Ayukta's jurisdiction and their inability to issue binding orders. en-us Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2023 21:30:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307362 The High Court held that the Upa Lok Ayukta lacked jurisdiction to entertain a civil dispute pending before a competent Civil Court. It emphasized that Lok Ayukta bodies do not have appellate authority over designated forums and cannot issue positive directions. The petitioner was granted liberty to withdraw the complaint and pursue remedies in the Civil Court or other competent authorities. The writ petition was disposed of, confirming the recommendatory nature of the Lok Ayukta's jurisdiction and their inability to issue binding orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307362