https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307355 At the quashing stage, the High Court held that it would not test disputed facts or the truth of allegations if the FIR and complaint, read as a whole, disclosed cognizable offences. Allegations of fabrication of resignation papers, board resolutions, annual returns and other corporate records, followed by their use before statutory and judicial forums, made out a prima facie case of cheating, forgery, use of forged documents and falsification of accounts, so quashing was refused. The Court also held that parallel civil or company disputes, alleged mala fides and abuse of process did not bar prosecution on these facts. The plea of double jeopardy failed because the earlier matter involved distinct facts and offences and had not ended in conviction or acquittal. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:16:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307355 At the quashing stage, the High Court held that it would not test disputed facts or the truth of allegations if the FIR and complaint, read as a whole, disclosed cognizable offences. Allegations of fabrication of resignation papers, board resolutions, annual returns and other corporate records, followed by their use before statutory and judicial forums, made out a prima facie case of cheating, forgery, use of forged documents and falsification of accounts, so quashing was refused. The Court also held that parallel civil or company disputes, alleged mala fides and abuse of process did not bar prosecution on these facts. The plea of double jeopardy failed because the earlier matter involved distinct facts and offences and had not ended in conviction or acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307355