https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307354 The High Court set aside the Kerala Lok Ayukta's report, ruling that the District Registrar had jurisdiction under Section 45B of the Kerala Stamp Act to determine the land value and impose stamp duty. The Court found the complaint lacked allegations of mal-administration, thus the Lok Ayukta lacked jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, annulling the Lok Ayukta's decision and granting the first Respondent the right to appeal the District Registrar's actions within thirty days. en-us Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2023 15:25:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307354 The High Court set aside the Kerala Lok Ayukta's report, ruling that the District Registrar had jurisdiction under Section 45B of the Kerala Stamp Act to determine the land value and impose stamp duty. The Court found the complaint lacked allegations of mal-administration, thus the Lok Ayukta lacked jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, annulling the Lok Ayukta's decision and granting the first Respondent the right to appeal the District Registrar's actions within thirty days. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307354