<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307353</link>
    <description>The Kerala (Scheduled Castes &amp; Scheduled Tribes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1996 was treated as a complete code for issuing community certificates, with the competent authority alone empowered to decide applications and the statutory appeal and further judicial review remaining the prescribed remedies. The Lok Ayukta&#039;s role under its enabling law was limited to investigating maladministration and communicating grievances; it could not bypass the special procedure or issue a binding direction to grant a certificate. Where a special enactment occupies the field, a general supervisory forum cannot supplant that mechanism. Accordingly, a direction for issuance of the community certificate was beyond jurisdiction and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 15:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307353</link>
      <description>The Kerala (Scheduled Castes &amp; Scheduled Tribes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1996 was treated as a complete code for issuing community certificates, with the competent authority alone empowered to decide applications and the statutory appeal and further judicial review remaining the prescribed remedies. The Lok Ayukta&#039;s role under its enabling law was limited to investigating maladministration and communicating grievances; it could not bypass the special procedure or issue a binding direction to grant a certificate. Where a special enactment occupies the field, a general supervisory forum cannot supplant that mechanism. Accordingly, a direction for issuance of the community certificate was beyond jurisdiction and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>