<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 139 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32360</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 4/ST/APPL/ALLB/2008 was dismissed. The Judicial Member ruled that the service provider, who registered before the Amnesty Scheme&#039;s introduction, was eligible for its benefits, emphasizing compliance with the scheme&#039;s requirements within the specified timeline to avoid penalties. Referring to past Tribunal decisions, the Member highlighted that timely compliance with tax payment under similar schemes should not attract penal consequences. The appeal lacked merit, and the service provider was not penalized for any delay in tax payment before the Amnesty Scheme deadline, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 139 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32360</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 4/ST/APPL/ALLB/2008 was dismissed. The Judicial Member ruled that the service provider, who registered before the Amnesty Scheme&#039;s introduction, was eligible for its benefits, emphasizing compliance with the scheme&#039;s requirements within the specified timeline to avoid penalties. Referring to past Tribunal decisions, the Member highlighted that timely compliance with tax payment under similar schemes should not attract penal consequences. The appeal lacked merit, and the service provider was not penalized for any delay in tax payment before the Amnesty Scheme deadline, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>