<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 213 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436187</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether intra-factory loading, supervision, weighment/inspection and inter-carting of raw materials and finished goods for a DTA/SEZ unit constituted &quot;Cargo Handling Service&quot; liable to service tax. Applying the statutory definition, the Tribunal held that cargo handling contemplates handling of cargo connected with transport/freight, and excludes mere transportation; the appellant&#039;s work orders showed only movement of goods within the recipient&#039;s plant without packing/unpacking and without handling cargo for any mode of transport. Relying on prior CESTAT precedent treating similar intra-mine movement as non-taxable under this head, the Tribunal held the demand unsustainable, including for authorised SEZ operations, and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 213 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436187</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether intra-factory loading, supervision, weighment/inspection and inter-carting of raw materials and finished goods for a DTA/SEZ unit constituted &quot;Cargo Handling Service&quot; liable to service tax. Applying the statutory definition, the Tribunal held that cargo handling contemplates handling of cargo connected with transport/freight, and excludes mere transportation; the appellant&#039;s work orders showed only movement of goods within the recipient&#039;s plant without packing/unpacking and without handling cargo for any mode of transport. Relying on prior CESTAT precedent treating similar intra-mine movement as non-taxable under this head, the Tribunal held the demand unsustainable, including for authorised SEZ operations, and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>