<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1746 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307348</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to reject leave to appeal against the Trial Court&#039;s judgment in a case involving dishonoured cheques. The High Court determined that the liability rested with M/s. Shah Enterprises, not M/s. Shah Agencies, based on discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s submissions. Emphasizing the need for the actual offender to be liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court dismissed the appeal, finding no basis to overturn the lower courts&#039; findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1746 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307348</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to reject leave to appeal against the Trial Court&#039;s judgment in a case involving dishonoured cheques. The High Court determined that the liability rested with M/s. Shah Enterprises, not M/s. Shah Agencies, based on discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s submissions. Emphasizing the need for the actual offender to be liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court dismissed the appeal, finding no basis to overturn the lower courts&#039; findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>