https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436182 The revenue's appeal for AY 2008-09 was dismissed, and the assessee's cross-objection was allowed. For AY 2009-10, the revenue's appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee's cross-objection was allowed. The Tribunal decisions were based on the invalidity of the DVO reference without rejecting the books of accounts, the lack of incriminating material for non-abated years, and the absence of corroborative evidence for the alleged unexplained expenditures and on-money payments. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2023 13:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436182 The revenue's appeal for AY 2008-09 was dismissed, and the assessee's cross-objection was allowed. For AY 2009-10, the revenue's appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee's cross-objection was allowed. The Tribunal decisions were based on the invalidity of the DVO reference without rejecting the books of accounts, the lack of incriminating material for non-abated years, and the absence of corroborative evidence for the alleged unexplained expenditures and on-money payments. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436182