<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 82 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of service tax and education cess for the extended period of limitation, except for the period before 10-9-2004, and directed the Commissioner to recalculate the correct amount. Interest under section 75 on the accurate tax and cess was affirmed, while penalties were revoked. The appeal was resolved accordingly, and the miscellaneous application was deemed irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 82 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of service tax and education cess for the extended period of limitation, except for the period before 10-9-2004, and directed the Commissioner to recalculate the correct amount. Interest under section 75 on the accurate tax and cess was affirmed, while penalties were revoked. The appeal was resolved accordingly, and the miscellaneous application was deemed irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>