<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1852 (11) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307333</link>
    <description>The appeal is allowed as the Statute of Limitations applies in India, valid in suits between Hindoos, and the Plaintiff&#039;s residence &quot;beyond the seas&quot; is recognized. The rejoinder was insufficient, and the Plaintiff&#039;s replication presents a valid defense. The Supreme Court&#039;s judgment is overturned, and the case is remitted for further proceedings in line with this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 1852 00:00:00 +0553</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 15:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1852 (11) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307333</link>
      <description>The appeal is allowed as the Statute of Limitations applies in India, valid in suits between Hindoos, and the Plaintiff&#039;s residence &quot;beyond the seas&quot; is recognized. The rejoinder was insufficient, and the Plaintiff&#039;s replication presents a valid defense. The Supreme Court&#039;s judgment is overturned, and the case is remitted for further proceedings in line with this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 1852 00:00:00 +0553</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>