https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307332 The court held that the specially empowered officer under the COFEPOSA Act has the independent power to revoke a detention order. It also ruled that the observations in a previous case regarding the revocation power are binding. Additionally, the court found that if the detaining officer fails to make an independent decision but the representation is considered by an appropriate authority, it does not violate constitutional safeguards. The writ petition was referred to the appropriate Bench for final disposal on other issues. en-us Fri, 26 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2023 15:11:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307332 The court held that the specially empowered officer under the COFEPOSA Act has the independent power to revoke a detention order. It also ruled that the observations in a previous case regarding the revocation power are binding. Additionally, the court found that if the detaining officer fails to make an independent decision but the representation is considered by an appropriate authority, it does not violate constitutional safeguards. The writ petition was referred to the appropriate Bench for final disposal on other issues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307332