https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307329 A review under Section 114 read with Order 47 CPC is not confined only to the Judge who passed the original order. The Court distinguished the substantive limits of review from the forum competent to hear it, holding that another Judge may not re-appreciate or reconstruct the merits merely because a different view is possible, but the review is still maintainable before an assigned Judge when the original Judge is unavailable. Rule 3 of Chapter XXX of the High Court Appellate Side Rules permits the matter to be placed before the regular Single Judge Court or another Judge nominated by the Chief Justice, thereby preserving the remedy despite a change in judicial assignment. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2023 12:44:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307329 A review under Section 114 read with Order 47 CPC is not confined only to the Judge who passed the original order. The Court distinguished the substantive limits of review from the forum competent to hear it, holding that another Judge may not re-appreciate or reconstruct the merits merely because a different view is possible, but the review is still maintainable before an assigned Judge when the original Judge is unavailable. Rule 3 of Chapter XXX of the High Court Appellate Side Rules permits the matter to be placed before the regular Single Judge Court or another Judge nominated by the Chief Justice, thereby preserving the remedy despite a change in judicial assignment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307329