<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 444 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307326</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the impugned notification dated 26th August 1993, amending Rule 23(7) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. The court found the amendment to be within the powers conferred by the Parent Act, serving the public interest by protecting consumer rights and ensuring transparency in pricing. The amendment was deemed reasonable, non-discriminatory, and aimed at preventing malpractices without unduly burdening manufacturers and retailers. The court dismissed the petitions challenging the notification and amendment, affirming their legality and beneficial impact on consumer protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 11:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 444 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307326</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the impugned notification dated 26th August 1993, amending Rule 23(7) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. The court found the amendment to be within the powers conferred by the Parent Act, serving the public interest by protecting consumer rights and ensuring transparency in pricing. The amendment was deemed reasonable, non-discriminatory, and aimed at preventing malpractices without unduly burdening manufacturers and retailers. The court dismissed the petitions challenging the notification and amendment, affirming their legality and beneficial impact on consumer protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>