<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 156 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32352</link>
    <description>HC held that a loan obtained for trading, later waived and retained in the business, constituted taxable income as it enriched the trading operations. Applying the Supreme Court principle, the waived amount, though initially outside tax net, became assessable when reflected in the profit and loss account. Following similar precedent, the court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 156 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32352</link>
      <description>HC held that a loan obtained for trading, later waived and retained in the business, constituted taxable income as it enriched the trading operations. Applying the Supreme Court principle, the waived amount, though initially outside tax net, became assessable when reflected in the profit and loss account. Following similar precedent, the court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>