https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307324 The court held that the appointment of the arbitrator by M.T.N.L. instead of the Central Government under Section 7-B of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 was ultra vires. The appointment and award were quashed, and the Central Government was directed to appoint an arbitrator. Recovery of the disputed amount was stayed. The court emphasized the necessity of Central Government involvement in arbitrator appointments under Section 7-B for legality and validity, disposing of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner with costs awarded. en-us Mon, 04 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2023 09:38:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307324 The court held that the appointment of the arbitrator by M.T.N.L. instead of the Central Government under Section 7-B of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 was ultra vires. The appointment and award were quashed, and the Central Government was directed to appoint an arbitrator. Recovery of the disputed amount was stayed. The court emphasized the necessity of Central Government involvement in arbitrator appointments under Section 7-B for legality and validity, disposing of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner with costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307324