<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 365 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32351</link>
    <description>HC held that interest earned on funds arising from and used in the assessee&#039;s ongoing property development business is taxable as business income rather than income from other sources. Relying on comparable precedents, the court found the facts aligned with prior decisions and concluded the interest was properly assessed as business income. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 365 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32351</link>
      <description>HC held that interest earned on funds arising from and used in the assessee&#039;s ongoing property development business is taxable as business income rather than income from other sources. Relying on comparable precedents, the court found the facts aligned with prior decisions and concluded the interest was properly assessed as business income. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>