<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 198 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436172</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the notice issued under Section 148 to a non-existent assessee post-merger was legally untenable. Relying on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, the Court set aside and quashed the notice, granting relief to the petitioner. The decision emphasized the legal principle that an amalgamating entity ceases to exist upon merger, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 198 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436172</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the notice issued under Section 148 to a non-existent assessee post-merger was legally untenable. Relying on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, the Court set aside and quashed the notice, granting relief to the petitioner. The decision emphasized the legal principle that an amalgamating entity ceases to exist upon merger, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>