https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436147 The Commission determined that the Appellant abused its dominant position by imposing unfair conditions on OEMs through the pre-installation of the GMS Suite, breaching Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Commission found the Appellant's conduct anti-competitive, limiting technical development and denying market access to competing apps. The investigation by the Director General was deemed fair, and the absence of a Judicial Member did not invalidate the Commission's order. The penalty based on relevant turnover was upheld, with the Commission's order sustained except for the deletion of specific directions in paragraph 617. The Appellant was not granted additional relief beyond this modification. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2023 08:24:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436147 The Commission determined that the Appellant abused its dominant position by imposing unfair conditions on OEMs through the pre-installation of the GMS Suite, breaching Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Commission found the Appellant's conduct anti-competitive, limiting technical development and denying market access to competing apps. The investigation by the Director General was deemed fair, and the absence of a Judicial Member did not invalidate the Commission's order. The penalty based on relevant turnover was upheld, with the Commission's order sustained except for the deletion of specific directions in paragraph 617. The Appellant was not granted additional relief beyond this modification. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436147