<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 172 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436146</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority upheld the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision to reduce the claim amount after provisional admission, emphasizing the professional&#039;s right to revise amounts based on additional information. The Authority found the Resolution Professional did not exceed jurisdiction and that the claim amount mentioned in the Section 7 application is not final for determining voting rights. The Appellant&#039;s contention that a previous arbitration award was irrelevant was dismissed, as the Authority deemed the claim amount calculation correct and found no error in the Resolution Professional&#039;s actions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 08:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 172 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436146</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority upheld the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision to reduce the claim amount after provisional admission, emphasizing the professional&#039;s right to revise amounts based on additional information. The Authority found the Resolution Professional did not exceed jurisdiction and that the claim amount mentioned in the Section 7 application is not final for determining voting rights. The Appellant&#039;s contention that a previous arbitration award was irrelevant was dismissed, as the Authority deemed the claim amount calculation correct and found no error in the Resolution Professional&#039;s actions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>