<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 160 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436134</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, accepting the compromise reached between the parties. The judgment of conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Act were quashed, and the petitioner was acquitted of the charge. The petitioner was directed to deposit a token compounding fee and an amount deposited earlier was ordered to be released in his favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 08:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 160 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436134</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, accepting the compromise reached between the parties. The judgment of conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Act were quashed, and the petitioner was acquitted of the charge. The petitioner was directed to deposit a token compounding fee and an amount deposited earlier was ordered to be released in his favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>