<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1451 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307317</link>
    <description>Rule 28 of the Orissa Education (Establishment, Recognition and Management of Private High Schools) Rules, 1991 requires reconstitution of an aided high school Managing Committee through the prescribed statutory process, including the Headmaster or teacher-in-charge as ex officio Secretary, nomination of the President by the Sub-Collector, and active steps by the Inspector. The provision imposes an independent duty on the competent authority and does not allow mechanical approval of a proposal forwarded without application of mind. Where the approval process is not the product of the required statutory exercise, the resulting approval is unsustainable and may be quashed, with the matter remitted for fresh action in accordance with the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 22:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1451 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307317</link>
      <description>Rule 28 of the Orissa Education (Establishment, Recognition and Management of Private High Schools) Rules, 1991 requires reconstitution of an aided high school Managing Committee through the prescribed statutory process, including the Headmaster or teacher-in-charge as ex officio Secretary, nomination of the President by the Sub-Collector, and active steps by the Inspector. The provision imposes an independent duty on the competent authority and does not allow mechanical approval of a proposal forwarded without application of mind. Where the approval process is not the product of the required statutory exercise, the resulting approval is unsustainable and may be quashed, with the matter remitted for fresh action in accordance with the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>