<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 157 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436131</link>
    <description>HC addressed a challenge to an appellate authority&#039;s order regarding invoice production. The court interpreted Rule 138A of GST Rules, affirming the requirement of physical invoice submission. The impugned order was set aside, with directions for the petitioner to produce physical invoices within two weeks. The appellate authority was instructed to complete proceedings within four weeks, preserving its independent decision-making authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 157 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436131</link>
      <description>HC addressed a challenge to an appellate authority&#039;s order regarding invoice production. The court interpreted Rule 138A of GST Rules, affirming the requirement of physical invoice submission. The impugned order was set aside, with directions for the petitioner to produce physical invoices within two weeks. The appellate authority was instructed to complete proceedings within four weeks, preserving its independent decision-making authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>