<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 156 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436130</link>
    <description>HC found that GST registration cancellation with retrospective effect was improper. The court directed cancellation from show cause notice date (11.12.2020) instead of original registration date (01.07.2017). Respondents retain rights to pursue tax recovery, interest, and penalties consistent with legal provisions. The decision emphasized procedural fairness in exercising administrative powers under Section 29(2) of CGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 156 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436130</link>
      <description>HC found that GST registration cancellation with retrospective effect was improper. The court directed cancellation from show cause notice date (11.12.2020) instead of original registration date (01.07.2017). Respondents retain rights to pursue tax recovery, interest, and penalties consistent with legal provisions. The decision emphasized procedural fairness in exercising administrative powers under Section 29(2) of CGST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>