<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 131 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436105</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should be for deliberate non-compliance and not for technical breaches, especially when the taxpayer acted in good faith. Considering the genuine reasons for the delay in submitting the tax audit report, the Tribunal found the penalty unwarranted and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 08:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 131 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436105</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should be for deliberate non-compliance and not for technical breaches, especially when the taxpayer acted in good faith. Considering the genuine reasons for the delay in submitting the tax audit report, the Tribunal found the penalty unwarranted and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>