<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436100</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals by deleting additions made under section 68 for capitation fees and unexplained deposits, as well as the ad-hoc disallowance of expenses. Emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and the requirement for conclusive evidence, the tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions unjustified, particularly due to the lack of opportunity for cross-examination and insufficient proof of alleged payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 21:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436100</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals by deleting additions made under section 68 for capitation fees and unexplained deposits, as well as the ad-hoc disallowance of expenses. Emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and the requirement for conclusive evidence, the tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions unjustified, particularly due to the lack of opportunity for cross-examination and insufficient proof of alleged payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>