<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 121 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436095</link>
    <description>In Section 138 prosecutions, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 arise on admitted cheque issuance, but they remain rebuttable through cross-examination, surrounding circumstances, or independent evidence. The text explains that a probable defence can be made out by challenging the complainant&#039;s financial capacity and the existence of a legally enforceable debt. Doubt over an alleged cash loan, lack of written documentation, inconsistencies in the claimed withdrawal and advance, and a defence of misuse of blank signed cheques were treated as sufficient to shake the debt claim and require cogent proof of liability from the complainant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 08:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 121 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436095</link>
      <description>In Section 138 prosecutions, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 arise on admitted cheque issuance, but they remain rebuttable through cross-examination, surrounding circumstances, or independent evidence. The text explains that a probable defence can be made out by challenging the complainant&#039;s financial capacity and the existence of a legally enforceable debt. Doubt over an alleged cash loan, lack of written documentation, inconsistencies in the claimed withdrawal and advance, and a defence of misuse of blank signed cheques were treated as sufficient to shake the debt claim and require cogent proof of liability from the complainant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>