<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 58 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32337</link>
    <description>Commission paid to a foreign-based company for services rendered outside the territorial waters was treated as outside the service tax net for the period before section 66A was inserted. The Tribunal relied on its earlier precedent and the departmental circular that services provided beyond territorial waters did not attract service tax until the statutory amendment took effect. On that basis, the demand for the earlier period and the connected penalty were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 58 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32337</link>
      <description>Commission paid to a foreign-based company for services rendered outside the territorial waters was treated as outside the service tax net for the period before section 66A was inserted. The Tribunal relied on its earlier precedent and the departmental circular that services provided beyond territorial waters did not attract service tax until the statutory amendment took effect. On that basis, the demand for the earlier period and the connected penalty were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>