<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1160 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307299</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, citing the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify grounds for penalty imposition. Relying on a relevant High Court decision, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty amount. The appeal highlighted the necessity of accurately specifying penalty grounds in such proceedings, resulting in the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 20:58:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1160 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307299</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, citing the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify grounds for penalty imposition. Relying on a relevant High Court decision, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty amount. The appeal highlighted the necessity of accurately specifying penalty grounds in such proceedings, resulting in the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>