<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 193 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32331</link>
    <description>The Bench ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that only amounts received for C &amp;amp; F services should be subject to Service Tax, excluding additional expenses like loading and unloading charges. The decision was based on precedents from previous cases, providing relief to the appellants by allowing their stay applications and appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 193 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32331</link>
      <description>The Bench ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that only amounts received for C &amp;amp; F services should be subject to Service Tax, excluding additional expenses like loading and unloading charges. The decision was based on precedents from previous cases, providing relief to the appellants by allowing their stay applications and appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>