<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 103 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both of Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2012-13 and the enhancement of opening stock for AY 2013-14. The Tribunal emphasized the difference in valuation methods and the principle that closing stock of one year should be the opening stock of the next, relying on legal precedents to support its conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 103 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both of Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2012-13 and the enhancement of opening stock for AY 2013-14. The Tribunal emphasized the difference in valuation methods and the principle that closing stock of one year should be the opening stock of the next, relying on legal precedents to support its conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>