<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 97 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee by quashing and canceling the assessment order passed under Section 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the approval granted by the JCIT for the assessment was invalid as it was done mechanically without proper application of mind, rendering the assessment unsustainable. The additional ground raised by the assessee concerning the validity of the Search Assessment Order was admitted and upheld, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 97 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee by quashing and canceling the assessment order passed under Section 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the approval granted by the JCIT for the assessment was invalid as it was done mechanically without proper application of mind, rendering the assessment unsustainable. The additional ground raised by the assessee concerning the validity of the Search Assessment Order was admitted and upheld, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>