<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 85 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, ruling that the penalty imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not sustainable due to the invalid notice issued without specifying the relevant limb of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clearly communicating penalty proceedings to ensure fairness and adherence to legal requirements, ultimately leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 85 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, ruling that the penalty imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not sustainable due to the invalid notice issued without specifying the relevant limb of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clearly communicating penalty proceedings to ensure fairness and adherence to legal requirements, ultimately leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>