<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 80 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436054</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing potential adjustment of the collected amount if the market fee is deemed exempt from GST. The decision was based on the interpretation of the exemption notification and the absence of a provision for refund or adjustment of GST. The Court emphasized that the representation of the petitioner should be addressed by the respondents within one month in accordance with relevant notifications and circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 80 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436054</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing potential adjustment of the collected amount if the market fee is deemed exempt from GST. The decision was based on the interpretation of the exemption notification and the absence of a provision for refund or adjustment of GST. The Court emphasized that the representation of the petitioner should be addressed by the respondents within one month in accordance with relevant notifications and circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>