<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 74 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the additions made under Sections 68 and 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The detailed analysis and documentary evidence provided by the assessee sufficiently discharged the onus of proving the nature and source of the share application money, and the pro-rata allotment of shares did not warrant the application of Section 56(2)(viib).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 20:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 74 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the additions made under Sections 68 and 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The detailed analysis and documentary evidence provided by the assessee sufficiently discharged the onus of proving the nature and source of the share application money, and the pro-rata allotment of shares did not warrant the application of Section 56(2)(viib).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>