<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 271 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32326</link>
    <description>An enhanced penalty order was found vulnerable for breach of natural justice because the appellant was not given an effective further opportunity of hearing after notice and fixation of the hearing. The denial of a proper hearing made the order procedurally inconsistent, so the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after granting the appellant due opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 271 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32326</link>
      <description>An enhanced penalty order was found vulnerable for breach of natural justice because the appellant was not given an effective further opportunity of hearing after notice and fixation of the hearing. The denial of a proper hearing made the order procedurally inconsistent, so the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after granting the appellant due opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>